Mirage
Round Timeline
Scoreboard
Pain— 13 rounds| Player | K | D | A | K/D | HS% | ADR | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICY | 17 | 14 | 3 | 1.21 | 52.9% | 79.1 | +3 |
| FL4MUS | 14 | 11 | 3 | 1.27 | 64.3% | 68.9 | +3 |
| FL1T | 12 | 15 | 7 | 0.80 | 75.0% | 70.3 | -3 |
| electroNic | 11 | 15 | 5 | 0.73 | 63.6% | 62.4 | -4 |
| fame | 8 | 16 | 3 | 0.50 | 75.0% | 46.5 | -8 |
Inferno
Round Timeline
Scoreboard
| Player | K | D | A | K/D | HS% | ADR | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| fame | 26 | 11 | 2 | 2.36 | 61.5% | 112.9 | +15 |
| electroNic | 17 | 14 | 9 | 1.21 | 41.2% | 114.8 | +3 |
| ICY | 14 | 11 | 8 | 1.27 | 42.9% | 80.9 | +3 |
| FL1T | 12 | 12 | 6 | 1.00 | 58.3% | 76.2 | 0 |
| FL4MUS | 10 | 17 | 4 | 0.59 | 60.0% | 52.9 | -7 |
Dust2
Round Timeline
Scoreboard
Pain— 13 rounds| Player | K | D | A | K/D | HS% | ADR | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL1T | 24 | 18 | 6 | 1.33 | 62.5% | 101.3 | +6 |
| electroNic | 22 | 17 | 10 | 1.29 | 31.8% | 88.1 | +5 |
| fame | 15 | 17 | 8 | 0.88 | 53.3% | 77.6 | -2 |
| ICY | 12 | 15 | 5 | 0.80 | 16.7% | 53.3 | -3 |
| FL4MUS | 9 | 19 | 9 | 0.47 | 66.7% | 49.9 | -10 |
Head-to-Head
Limited history — only 1 previous meeting between Virtus Pro and Painhas been parsed so far. The sample is too small to call a clear favourite based on H2H alone.
Map Win Rates
Map-by-map form based on each team's last 20 maps tracked by ProForge. Virtus Pro have won 6 of their last 12 decided maps (50%), while Pain sit at 9-11(45%). Big gaps highlighted on the right show potential ban/pick targets in the veto.
| Map | Virtus Pro W-L | Pain W-L | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ancient | 1-0 (100%) | 0-2 (0%) | Virtus Pro +100% |
| Anubis | 0-0 | 2-1 (67%) | — |
| Dust2 | 1-2 (33%) | 2-5 (29%) | — |
| Inferno | 3-0 (100%) | 2-1 (67%) | Virtus Pro +33% |
| Mirage | 1-2 (33%) | 1-1 (50%) | — |
| Nuke | 0-0 | 2-1 (67%) | — |
| Train | 0-2 (0%) | 0-0 | — |
Betting Stats
Form-based betting indicators derived directly from each team's recent demo-parsed matches. Use these as one input alongside live odds — sportsbook integration is coming soon.
Match Winner
Across their last 10 series, Virtus Pro are 4-3 (57%) and Pain are 5-5 (50%). The side with the better recent series record historically wins moneylines around 60% of the time in tracked matches.
Map Spread (BO3)
Virtus Pro have gone the distance in 25% of their recent BO3s; Pain in 38%. The higher these numbers, the more likely this fixture closes 2-1 rather than a clean 2-0 sweep — useful for map-spread and "decider map" markets.
Total Rounds
Recent maps featuring Virtus Pro averaged 20.3 rounds; Pain averaged 22.1. Combined, this is your starting indicator for over/under round totals on the map and series markets.
Stats based on parsed demo data from official match files.